Efficacy

PRIMA Study Design - A Phase 3 Trial in Advanced Ovarian Cancer1,2

PRIMA was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial examining the efficacy and safety of ZEJULA as 1L maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.1,2

PRIMA study design infographic
PRIMA study design infographic

In PRIMA, HRd status was determined using the FDA-approved Myriad myChoice® CDx as either tBRCAm and/or GIS+ (GIS ≥42).1,3

aPatients were stratified based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered (yes or no), best response to 1L platinum therapy (CR or PR) and homologous recombination (HR) status (deficient [HR-deficient], proficient [HR-proficient], or not determined).1,2

bPatients in PRIMA received a starting dose of either 200 mg or 300 mg based on their baseline body weight or platelet count (n=169), or a fixed starting dose of 300 mg daily (n=315) regardless of body weight or platelet count.1-3

PRIMA enrolled a broad range of patients, including patients with poor prognoses who were at higher risk of progression1,2,4-7:

Of patients in the overall population (N=733):

35%

had stage IV disease1,2

 

67%

had received
neoadjuvant chemotherapy1,2

 

84%

had residual disease after
primary debulking surgery4,c

 

Placebo: 8.2 Months1,2

MEDIAN PFS IN OVERALL POPULATION

72% of patients on placebo estimated to have progressed or died within 2 years after diagnosis2

cStage III and IV disease with visible residual tumor (>0 cm) after primary debulking surgery.4

The PRIMA population may be reflective of your clinical practice8

ZEJULA is the only once-daily oral PARP inhibitor monotherapy available for HRd patients.1,9,10

PFS in HRd Population

More than doubled median PFS vs placebo in HRd patients1,2

PFS in the HRd population (n=373)1,2,d

PFS in the HRd population line graph
PFS in the HRd population line graph

eCensored subjects are indicated by circles.

dAt the time of primary analysis.

Consistent efficacy observed across exploratory HRd subgroups2,3,11,f

BRCAwt (n=150)

HR, 0.50
(95% CI, 0.31-0.83)

50% reduction in risk of progression or death

Median PFS of 19.6 months for ZEJULA vs 8.2 months with placebo

BRCAm (n=223)

HR, 0.40
(95% CI, 0.27-0.62)

60% reduction in risk of progression or death

Median PFS of 22.1 months for ZEJULA vs 10.9 months with placebo

fExploratory subgroup analysis, not powered to detect a statistically significant treatment effect. Interpret results with caution.

PFS in Overall Population

ZEJULA may mean more time living progression-free1,2

Significantly longer median PFS vs placebo1,2,g

PFS in the overall population (N=733)

PFS in the overall population line graph
PFS in the overall population line graph

hCensored subjects are indicated by circles.

gAt the time of the PFS analysis, limited overall survival data were available, with 11% deaths in the overall population.1

PFS benefit was observed across exploratory patient subgroups vs placebo2,f

iIf test results were inconclusive or the test was not done, tumors were considered HRnd.2

fExploratory subgroup analysis, not powered to detect a statistically significant treatment effect. Interpret results with caution.

PRIMA Long-term PFS

HRd Long-term PFS

More than doubled 4-year PFS rates observed with ZEJULA in HRd patients vs placebo12

Exploratory ad hoc analysisj

3.5-year median follow-up of investigator-assessed PFS in the HRd population (n=373)12,j

3.5-year median follow-up of investigator-assessed PFS in the HRd population line graph
3.5-year median follow-up of investigator-assessed PFS in the HRd population line graph

kCensored subjects are indicated by circles.

jInterpret results with caution.

  • Not powered to detect a statistically significant treatment effect
  • 4-year PFS rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curve, with median follow-up time of 3.5 years12
  • The probability of patients in the HRd population to be alive and progression-free at 4 years was 38% in the ZEJULA arm vs 17% in the placebo arm12
  • With 3.5-year median follow-up, overall survival data remain immature at 41.2% for the overall population12

ZEJULA was associated with long-term PFS benefits for patients with HRd ovarian cancer12

Overall Population Long-term PFS

Continued confidence with ZEJULA: Durable PFS benefit observed consistent with primary analysis1,2,12

Exploratory ad hoc analysisl

3.5-year median follow-up of investigator-assessed PFS in overall population (N=733)12,l

3.5-year median follow-up of investigator-assessed PFS in the overall population line graph
3.5-year median follow-up of investigator-assessed PFS in the overall population line graph

mCensored subjects are indicated by circles.

lInterpret results with caution.

  • Not powered to detect a statistically significant treatment effect
  • 4-year PFS rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curve, with median follow-up time of 3.5 years12
  • The probability of patients in the overall population to be alive and progression-free at 4 years was 24% in the ZEJULA arm vs 14% in the placebo arm12
  • With 3.5-year median follow-up, overall survival data remain immature at 41.2% for the overall population12

Reduction in risk of progression or death remained consistent with the primary analysis1,2,12

With ZEJULA, durable outcomes were observed in PRIMA long-term data4

References

  1. ZEJULA (niraparib) Tablets. Prescribing Information. GSK; 2023.

  2. González-Martín A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2391-2402. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910962

  3. González-Martín A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, et al. [supplementary appendix]. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):1-42. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910962

  4. Data on File, GSK.

  5. Horowitz NS, Miller A, Rungruang B, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(8):937-943. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.3106

  6. Chang S-J, Hodeib M, Chang J, Bristow RE. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):493-498. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.040

  7. Davis A, Tinker AV, Friedlander M. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(3):624-631. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.038

  8. Rodrigues M, Joly F, Ray-Coquard I, et al. Poster presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September 16-21, 2021; virtual.

  9. Lynparza (olaparib). Prescribing Information. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2023.

  10. Rubraca (rucaparib). Prescribing Information. Clovis Oncology, Inc; 2023.

  11. Monk BJ, Han S, Pothuri B, et al. Presented at: Society of Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer Webinar Series; March 28-31, 2020.
  12. González-Martín A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2023;189:112908. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.024